By a relatively wide margin, the members of the Online Film Critics Society have voted Crash, which won the Academy Award for Best Picture for 2005, as the film least deserving of that award in Oscar history.With 38 members voting, 11 chose Crash as the film as the least-worthy Oscar Best Picture ever. One member complained:
I'm just going to pick Crash as a movie I felt was flatly undeserving, since I've been writing about movies. There are many years where I think the movie that won was the wrong movie (Rocky over Network, Forrest Gump over Pulp Fiction), but Crash isn't just worse than all of its competition, it's just a poor, melodramatic movie. American Beauty has some of the same problems, but that has several excellent performances in it to make up for it.
Beyond this “winning” film, however, there was less consensus, with the remaining votes spread across 15 movies:
2001: A Beautiful Mind (4 votes)
2000: Gladiator (3 votes)
1997: Titanic (3 votes)
1989: Driving Miss Daisy (3 votes)
2002: Chicago (2 votes)
1995: Braveheart (2 votes)
1994: Forrest Gump (2 votes)
2008: Slumdog Millionaire (1 vote)
2004: Million Dollar Baby (1 vote)
1999: American Beauty (1 vote)
1998: Shakespeare in Love (1 vote)
1996: The English Patient (1 vote)
1982: Gandhi (1 vote)
1952: The Greatest Show on Earth (1 vote)
1939: Gone with the Wind (1 vote)
Asked to optionally comment on their choices, however, the detractors of Driving Miss Daisy were most vocal. Said one member:
Spike Lee is correct. How does the Academy justify rewarding such a "safe" formula flick like this and ignore Do the Right Thing? (but this is only one of many erroneous selections over the years--tough choice to make)
And another:
Although Miss Daisy is a good film, the actual Best Picture of 1989 wasn't even nominated. I'm referring to Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing - a movie whose power is still felt today, unlike Miss Daisy, which has become irrelevant. The snub of Lee's masterpiece remains one of the most egregious errors in Oscar history.
Titanic garnered several tongue lashings, too:
There's a category for CGI work, which is all Titanic deserved recognition for. Otherwise it's a familiar and sappy romance that should have been blown out of the water by Good Will Hunting or As Good as It Gets.
and
Titanic was obviously a crowd pleaser but in the face of a more deserved candidate like LA Confidential, it just doesn't stack up. Not to mention I consider Titanic to be one of the worst movies ever made.
Finally, the one voter for Gandhi said:
A fatuous bore, and historically dishonest to boot. Who would ever deliberately set out to watch this squareheaded snoozer today?
1 comment:
I would like to know the reason that motivated one voter to choose Gone With The Wind as least deserving. Gone With The Wind changed film from there on and has had a lasting impact on film.
I beg to differ with those and Driving Miss Daisy. Driving Miss Daisy gave a sense of hope which is what is needed more than "racism is the way it will always be and that's the end of it." Do the Right Thing was gypped at the Oscars for a nomination, but still would have lost to Driving Miss Daisy.
What about Oliver! and The Lion in Winter? (1968)
Or How Green Was My Valley beating Citizen Kane? (1941) I must say this one is difficult because both are great movies but I mean, really, IT'S CITIZEN KANE!
There are a number of other choices, but the main one I agree with is Titanic. There were so many other great films that it feels this one won because it was the fan favorite.
Post a Comment